Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AcuEnergetics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

AcuEnergetics

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I previously put a WP:PROD on this article on the grounds "No reliably-sourced evidence that the subject of the article meets the notability criteria. (The references provided date from the 5th century AD to 2000AD and do not appear to directly relate to AcuEnergetics.)". The article creator removed the Prod along with the maintenance tags, these indirect references and some of the article text. The article is now unreferenced and lacks any evidence that this "healing modality" meets the notability criteria so I'm bringing it to AfD. AllyD (talk) 06:56, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable, no independent sourcing; absolutely nothing found at Google News Archive or Google Scholar. Seems to be just another form of "medicine based on the human energetic system", promoted by a single individual, which has not become generally known in alternative medicine. Created and de-prodded by an SPA. --MelanieN (talk) 20:39, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm feeling a negative energy about this one. Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * But, captain, that is not LOGICAL! ;-D --MelanieN (talk) 05:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Blatant self-promotion. I had previously gotten it speedy deleted it under G11. The only two references (the med journals) the article has got nothing to do with AcuEnergetics. Both of them merely state "that cultivating forgiveness improved markers of cardiovascular stress". Might even border on a db-hoax. — westeros91talk to me! 04:36, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.