Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acura RL

This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the page entitled Acura RL.'

This page is kept as an historic record.

The result of the debate was to keep the article.


 * Page has no info. If there were any it should go the acura page. 199.43.176.12 has a long history of vandalism, look at fx Flatulence and Scenic design. Thue 19:25, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's POV, rambly, content-free, unencyclopedic.  AFAIC we could speedy-delete it without trouble. - jredmond 19:43, 21 May 2004 (UTC) Have changed my mind; see below.
 * Keep and list on Needy Pages. It's a real car model worthy of an article. Jgm 20:14, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
 * I have replaced with a hopefully much more informative stub and thus vote to keep in this form. &mdash;Morven 21:20, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
 * The new article is very nice! Keep. Btw, what is the policy on articles like the original one; it had zero content and merit, but the subject could potentially become worthwhile. Should one just delete it or ask that it be fixed, when fixing it would be like starting from zero? Thue 00:20, 22 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Personal choice, really. It depends on the quality of the article, and how much of an eventualist you are. -- Cyrius|&#9998 06:14, May 23, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep the revised version. Thanks Morven! - jredmond 05:02, 22 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Abigail 01:54, May 22, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, looks fine. --Starx 04:17, 23 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep new stub. -- Cyrius|&#9998 06:14, May 23, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue or the deletion should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.