Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdBan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 17:28, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

AdBan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails WP:NOTABILITY, proded previously ;"Not notable. No reliable sources independent of the subject.". Hu12 (talk) 12:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Could've went for A7 maybe. Fails to establish notability. Dengero (talk) 15:14, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Wow, this is a weird one. I'd say this is a 'movement' that fails WP:GNG or at worst a neologism. § FreeRangeFrog 23:56, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Apart from being a pile of nonsense, the author appears to have a conflict of interest. All in all, even if the reasons above prove false, this article ought to be deleted until such time as a neutral editor wishes to create it. Op47 (talk) 14:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:POINT and as above. If the article is significantly improved, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.