Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ada Apa Dengan Rina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (a bold non-admin closure)

Initial concerns over a lack of reliable sources were legitimate against WP:NFILM but after a few editors provided sources, and a subsequent relisting, the consensus was stable following the point in which the sources were found. Mkdw talk 00:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Ada Apa Dengan Rina

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:02, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete A quick google search reveals no reliable sources, or anything showing notability. Mdann52 (talk) 15:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brunei-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP:NF. Brunei Times has a substantive article telling us that this is "Brunei's very first full-length movie to be shown in cinemas"  Per WP:NF, THAT "first" is a decent assertion of notability. With Pelita Brunei, (Malay language) also writing about the film,  we now have (so far) two sources in the article discussing the film and verifying that assertion. As it is due to debut on February 17, it serves the project that we cover this first-ever feature film... even if it is only notable in and to Brunei and in the Malay language.   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Schmidt! Excellent rationale! --Tito Dutta (talk) 10:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:54, 31 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep as per schmidt. LenaLeonard (talk) 20:39, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Schmidt's argument seems sufficient to me, but to add another argument: Another article at the Borneo Post appears to be independent, and thus WP:GNG appears satisfied as well.  --j⚛e deckertalk 22:28, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.