Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Aaron Wapniak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:09, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Adam Aaron Wapniak

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

These two individuals are not independently notable. The only non-trivial mention they seem to receive is this - and that's a press release. (There's also, I suppose, this passing nod.) Their names can be mentioned at Jewish Architectural Heritage Foundation (itself problematic from a notability viewpoint) or at Northern Transylvania Holocaust Memorial Museum (notable, just not a great article) -- and of course they already are. Also worth mentioning is the fact that this is an autobiography (NYArtichoke used to be Awapniak): not in itself fatal, but still, you should be able to have someone else write about you. Biruitorul Talk 14:53, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page:

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete both Very questionable notability, highly promotional, contextual importance not asserted by neutral sources. Dahn (talk) 01:00, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - if the Romanian Holocaust Museum has an article, a redirect there might be appropriate. Aside from that, he seems like a nice enough guy but his various philanthropic works are wholly non-notable. - DustFormsWords (talk) 01:12, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I tend to regard it as a tell-tell sign of lack of notability to find a sentence at the end, "He has also a single patent in another totally unrelated field. " or the equivalent    DGG ( talk ) 04:47, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.