Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Algar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:55, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Adam Algar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCRIC. Although has played in a T20I for Spain, this was not part of a World T20, Global Qualifier or Regional Final, per point 4.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 11:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 11:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 11:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 11:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 11:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Delete Ok I agree with Lugnuts on the notability issues of this cricketer and I respect his proposal for deletion because he has written plenty of articles abide by the policies and guidelines. I thought those who have played in the recently concluded 2019 Spain Triangular T20I Series from Spain and Malta except Estonia XI are recognised to be T20 International cricketers from that point onwards. I first of all created for Awais Ahmed who got enough notability after scoring a century in the second T20I match of the series between Spain and Malta. Awais Ahmed has also been included in List of centuries in Twenty20 International cricket. It is noteworthy that ICC initially revealed the matches played between Spain and Malta had Twenty20 International (T20I) status, with both teams making their debuts in the format and further went onto announce that all matches played between Associate Members from 1 January 2019 would have T20I status. Sorry for my mistakes regarding the WikiProject Cricket policy guidelines. Abishe (talk) 12:43, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks Abishe - appreciate your feedback. Don't know if this now meets some kind of speedy-deletion requirements, with these comments from the article's creator.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 12:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per nom. Though these matches are T20I's, the standard is so low that the prior guidelines for inclusion of non-Test/ODI nations make perfect sense. It seems that the stats for T20I's are going to take a serious beating, with weaker opponents generally finding it easier to score more runs amongst themselves. StickyWicket (talk) 12:48, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet the general notability guidelines. This is true of a huge nyumber of cricket players. We really need to remove many of these articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * GNG is weak and meaningless, and contradicted by WP:N which states that an article should be met by either GNG or an appropriate subject-specific guideline. Bobo. 09:35, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment - This cricketer has, within the last week, appeared in an ITT match. Does this make this cricketer notable? If at some point the cricketer becomes notable, CSD G4 will not apply - according to the CSD page itself. Bobo. 09:37, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.