Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Arnold (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  05:43, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Adam Arnold (actor)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable child actor. He's only played one significant role, and I'm unable to find any sources about him that aren't either Wikipedia forks or incredibly trivial. He's still at school, and this article has been repeatedly vandalised (by his classmates, I'm guessing); I don't think it's worth the effort of keeping it clean. In accordance with WP:BLP, we should minimise the harm to him and delete the article. Robofish (talk) 19:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per BLP. Minors shouldn't be suffering from Wikipedia's open-editing, particularly when they are non-notable. لenna  vecia  21:25, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above.  —  Jake   Wartenberg  22:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't think the BLP concerns are a reason to delete the article; it can and should be protected. Notability seems the main issue; IMDb only lists three roles; is he still acting? Matt Deres (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per my improvements. I think it is within WP:ENTERTAINER now, with a notable play and a tv production, backed up by proper sources. The vandalism, which seems rather sporadic, is a non-issue in my opinion. decltype (talk) 16:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I can only find trivial mentions of this actor, e.g. automated entertainment profiles with no real content. Hazir (talk) 05:25, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Did you review the non-exclusive, but non-trivial mentions in The Times, The Guardian and The Daily Telegraph cited in the article? decltype (talk) 06:34, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, fleeting, apart from The Times. Hazir (talk) 12:17, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.