Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Beniquez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  18:37, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Adam Beniquez

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This individual was convicted of one murder, and I believe was charged with one other murder as well as a suspect in 7 other murders, including several police officers. I previously removed content from the article about the allegations that did not result in convictions per WP:BLPCRIME after this article was brought to WP:BLPN. After trying to find more information about the article subject, I have been unable to find any sources mentioning the article subject after February 1991. As a result of the lack of coverage since then, including for the conviction, and the lack of information on any of the allegations other than the one murder, I think this does not meet the general notability guidelines. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Wanted to say keep based on the epithet of the "most wanted man in Puerto Rico", but you're right in that his other murders have kind of died in the dirt. As it stands, he's a failure of both WP:CRIMINAL and WP:BLP1E. In particular, the "motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual" tenet cannot be upheld.  Kncny11  (shoot) 19:25, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, I believe that this article is viable and can been improved. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:01, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , why do you appear to be canvassing for votes , especially after you were warned about this type of behavior less than a week ago by another editor on your talk page? – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 03:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete (as currently stands). Sorry. Possibly I can see potential re: what this individual is notable for as opposed to (no disrespect intended) just another drug-related murder in an apartment, but looking online incl. at sites such as murderpedia.org - then looking at the contributions history of this article - it seems nobody has the time, parlance, or interest in even trying to construct the article to what it could be.--Kieronoldham (talk) 03:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.