Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Bilter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Adam Bilter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Poorly sourced WP:BLP of an entrepreneur, which makes no strong claim of notability under our inclusion rules for businesspeople. The notability here amounts to speaking at a conference and appearing on a TV show, and the sourcing for both of those things is stacked onto their own primary source web pages about themselves rather than to any reliable source coverage about those things -- and the only other source shown here at all is a simple business contacts directory (and à propos of nothing, why am I not surprised that said directory lists his business as an SEO/social media consultancy?) None of this is remotely enough to get a person into Wikipedia in and of itself — it takes reliable source coverage about him in media, verifying a claim of notability that would objectively pass our inclusion rules for businesspeople, but nothing like that has been shown here. Bearcat (talk) 01:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:28, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:28, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. GNews search for "Adam Bilter" gives one hit. Everything else on the main GSearch gives social media, press releases, and generally unhelpful sources. Fails GNG and BLP. Primefac (talk) 15:54, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Concur with above, also found nothing to establish notability. MB  23:21, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable businessman/entertainer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- no claim to notability and no sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:36, 15 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.