Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Buenz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:30, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Adam Buenz

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Local stained glass artist with no indications of notability. One of the four provided references is to the artist's own homepage, and the other three fail verification (i.e. they do not mention the artist at all). WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:59, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The article reads like an advertisement and there's no real indication of notability in the article. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 14:29, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No claim to notability. At best he is notable only locally within his chosen trade, which is not enough for Wikipedia. There are many skilled craftsmen elsewhere working on the restoration of window glass, some of it medieval. AJHingston (talk) 21:25, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. No indication of notability. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 17:18, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per all of the above. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.