Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Daniel Spencer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:07, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Adam Daniel Spencer

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced since 2007. Lack of reliable sources found. This appears to be a BLP1E subject --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 17:01, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  —--  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 17:13, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  —--  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 17:13, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sources found. No objection to covering this story if it's sufficiently covered by third-party media. (This kind of story pops up every now and then so I'm not sure how note-worthy this is.) However, at the moment, none of the information is verifiable, some of the content isn't really appropriate for non-public figures, and all-in-all it's a WP:BLP violation waiting to happen. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:26, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- These stories may be good for selling newspapers, but not really encyclopaedic. 3 B grades at A-level does not indicate great brilliance (or not yet), even iof taken young.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:00, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:BLP1E + lack of reliable third party references, - Reconsider  !  06:17, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.