Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Docker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Sort of weak keep, but given the discrepancy in the sources we'll default to keep for now. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  22:36, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Adam Docker

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:ATH but may pass under WP:GNG as called up for Pakistani national team (but hasn't played as far as I can see) but thought it was worth a debate Steve-Ho (talk) 19:46, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Steve-Ho (talk) 04:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Definitely fails WP:ATHLETE and merely being called up to the national squad without playing doesn't really count for anything. Only possible keeper would be general coverage in sources.  There seem to be two sources listed in the refs, so I guess extremely weak keep -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep through WP:GNG - more sources include this, this and this. Also, a google search of "Adam Karim Pakistan" brings up a few YouTube videos which claims that Docker/Karim (he uses the former for club football, the latter for international) played for Pakistan against Iraq in October 2007. GiantSnowman 21:10, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:GNG. Though I'm a little confused about this Iraq game: the FIFA report, which ought to be definitive, has him on the bench but not coming off it (assuming he is the player called Adam Luke Karim), but this piece on the UEFA site has him making his debut and quoted as saying he thought he did OK... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 21:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.