Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Effect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mairi 06:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Adam Effect


Interesting, but originial research. —Quarl (talk) 2006-11-22 05:53Z 
 * Delete. No such term shows up on a Google search.  See WP:NFT. --Elonka 06:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, also someone has to clean up after a backslashing proxy. MER-C 06:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Interesting concept, but there is no evidence that this theory has been published anywhere. Though I disagree with Elonka's deletion reasoning- simple Google searches are not always enough for something like this. Usually it's better to use information databases (e.g. LexisNexis). --- RockMFR 06:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. - Mailer Diablo 17:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research, and not many ghits for it either. --SunStar Net 21:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --ManiF 22:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.