Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Gentry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   14:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Adam Gentry
Fails WP:BIO and the google test. Would consider recreation if contestant becomes notable on the show (ie. first or second place). In comparision: Kathy Vavarick-O'Brien has been on two Survivor seasons and doesn't have a Wikipedia page. Adam Gentry has not even been shown on Survivor yet, has little past, and already has a page. The page is also completely uncited.TeckWizTalk Contribs # of Edits 18:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Has no notability. Currently is a contestant on a reality tv show and no relevant information has been given about himself.
 * Speedy delete - CSD A7. Tagged as such. MER-C 07:15, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Tagged removed (before I could even get to it, actually; good on ya, NawlinWiki!), definitely not a candidate under A7. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 13:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - The subject of the article is indeed a contestant in the upcoming season of this popular television show. The article already exists... Since it exists already, is causing no harm it should stay as the show starts in two weeks. By deleting the article we're only temporarily saving electrons.  The electron saving isn't worth undoing already existing work.  See the Wiki philosophy of Inclusionism --AStanhope 07:32, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I've removed the Speedy Delete tag while this deletion discussion is pending. --AStanhope 07:33, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can't find AStanhope's argument convincing. Saying someone might become notable isn't sufficient cause.  Also, as stated, this person does not currently pass the significance test, and the article is completely unsourced.  Badbilltucker 19:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not even get within spitting distance of being a notable person/celebrity. Tarc 02:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Speaks for itself. Ppoi307 16:48, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.