Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Gibson (computer scientist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:52, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Adam Gibson (computer scientist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  02:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  02:03, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete does not meet notability as either a businessman nor as an academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham (talk) 22:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 22:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Could not find anything except the cited articles, which are from reliable sources but only have passing mentions of the subject. – FenixFeather (talk) (Contribs) 23:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete can't find anything that suggests he's notable --Devokewater  @  17:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. All sources listed at the page atm do not satisfy "significant coverage" of the subject. Agree with everyone above. ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  02:36, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG. --  Dane talk </b> 19:52, 17 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.