Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Hauner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was this is why we go by consensus and why AfD is a discussion - delete! Johnleemk | Talk 07:04, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Adam Hauner
Just another Vanity page. Edited mainly by Cat-o-Matic1, his or her only edits. Vít Zvánovec 17:52, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete vanity page, nn-bio --Bachrach44 02:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Adam Hauner is well known webdesign pioneer and co-worker of several prime Czech websites. --Petr.adamek 11:41, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep (as Petr.adamek). Cinik 11:55, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep (Same reason as Petr.Adamek.) Tlusťa 13:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Petr.Adamek. --Terence Ong 15:03, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, user page in main namespace. Adam Hauner is very active on Czech Wiki (hence the few supporting votes above - such AfD also runs on Czech Wiki) and sometimes helps on English Wiki (thanks). While he may be known by fellow designers in Czech Republic (who form most of Czech Wikipedia crew) there's no indication he is also known outside this relatively small and quite fluid circle. I know about existence of websites he worked on but none of them is notable enough to have article on Czech Wiki. I had asked this user months ago to userfy the page and did again two days ago. Yesterday Hauner answered: "if you have problem with the page delete it" (in Czech, edit from 11:00, 16. 1. 2006). Pavel Vozenilek 22:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Note on possible reason of this AfD: the nominator had been banned from Czech Wikipedia (by voting procedure and Hauner (if I remember well) voted for the ban). This AfD may be seen as form of revenge. That doesn't change my opinion on delete, though. Pavel Vozenilek 22:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No, I simply don't find usefulness of this page for the (English speaking) world. If I could vote on cs:, I would vote quite opposite. -- Vít Zvánovec 09:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I am not questioning this. Pavel Vozenilek 20:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, vanity. Incognito 00:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.