Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Joseph John Wilson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-27 06:17Z 

Adam Joseph John Wilson

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This player is not listed on gmfc.net (the official Greenock Morton website), none of the fellow 'Ton fans I've spoken to have heard of him, and I spoke to a Morton youth player who hasn't heard of him, either. If he does exist then it's on the very fringes of the club and as such he's not competed in the professional leagues, so he's non-notable in any case. Nach0king 21:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixing nomination. No stance. -- saberwyn 02:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Either a hoax or very non-notable.  Delete either way.  Eluchil404 09:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete; lack of sources indicating notability – Qxz 10:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 13:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - likely hoax, if not on the GMFC website then suggests extreme lack of notability even if this person does exist. Qwghlm 13:37, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete even if we WP:AGF and assume this isn't a hoax, he is clearly not a recognised first team squad member as per the club's website, and at that level of football reserves/youths would not be considered notable..... ChrisTheDude 13:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Scottmsg 14:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and lack of references proving his actual existance --Angelo 02:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.