Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Joseph Pellerine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete g1 nonsense, WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Adam Joseph Pellerine

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Obviously attempting to state notability. No independent sources and nobody of that name w/ similar life story found via google search. Probably hoax. will381796 (talk) 02:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, possibly speedy - Google shows zero hits for this person. The article is written in a flowery manner, suggestive of a hoax. LonelyBeacon (talk) 02:35, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete as hoax, no Google hits for this person. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The comment below was left on the talk page by the page's creator: Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I am shocked that this article is being considered for deletion. I think it is sad that just due to the fact that it is a lesser known actor and has not attained a heightened level of "fame" that his article is to be deemed unworthy. If one were to think on such a level it would also deem independent or "indie" films unworthy simply due to the fact that they don't have as much money as commercial films to attain popularity with the masses. How can Wikipedia claim to be the "Free Encyclopedia" if it attempts to delete such articles? It may remain free price-wise, but there is no real freedom.
 * Free, yes, gullible, no. -- A. B. (talk) 03:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong delete and start stacking snowballs. -- A. B. (talk) 03:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7. No believable claims of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 'Delete as non-notable. Anarchia (talk) 06:45, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as claims to notability are a hoax. The claim that the subject is a lesser known actor in indie films is inconsistent with the article, which portrays him as the star of blockbuster movies who earns up to $7 million per film. He can't be both, and he certainly isn't the latter. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 10:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.