Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Kellerman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Adam Kellerman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just why is this person notable? Not per consensus Tennis Guidelines or Wikipedia NSPORT/Olympic guidelines. You usually have to win a paralympic medal in order to be notable. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:21, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep No, the guidelines say that you have to win a medal to be presumed notable. This is something quite different. Per Notability (sports): Subjects that do not meet the sport-specific criteria outlined in this guideline may still be notable if they meet the General Notability Guideline. The fact is that there has been significant independent coverage of Heath Davidson to write an article. We know this is true, because a substantial article has already been written. Any distinction between Olympians and Paralympians belongs to an earlier era. The latter are as well-known today. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Which is what was said... you usually have to win a medal... not always because rarely GNG will enter into the picture. If it can be shown he is the exception then that will be fine. If you are trying to say that like the Olympics all Paralympic athletes are notable, that's silly and off the charts wrong against consensus guidelines. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:46, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * All I meant was that for recent Paralympic athletes, widespread coverage in high-quality reliable sources is often the case. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:10, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * That's rare. And looking at the sources for this article I don't really see it. Many go to nothing at all, some go to articles that simply have his name in a list, or one has his bio write-up at the Paralympic website. So far those reference in the article don't cut it so I hope there is more "widespread" coverage that is hidden from view. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Meet GNG. The SMH article is the tipper for me. http://www.smh.com.au/sport/olympics/rio-2016/rio-paralympics-adam-kellerman-out-to-break-a-12year-medal-drought-for-australia-20160616-gpl1rp.html Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:09, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Now... that's a great article for GNG! Not a tiny gazette, not just his name on a ledger. I formally withdraw my deletion request. He doesn't meet WikiProject Guidelines, but he meets GNG. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.