Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Klich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anyone who would like to create a redirect here to Bogdan Klich, feel free. Liz Read! Talk! 21:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Adam Klich

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There are no sources (or indication) I can find to suggest this academician is notable (his son Bogdan Klich is notable and has a significant and well sourced entry). I did find an obituary posted in the "mining machines journal." which was his employer.

https://komag.eu/images/maszynygornicze1/MM2022/MM3_2022/MM_2022_3_KLICH.pdf Flibbertigibbets (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:42, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Leaning Keep He was an "Honorary Professor" at AGH University of Science and Technology, which would seem to meet WP:NACADEMIC, 5. It also says he was chair of a section of the Polish Academy of Sciences for 22 years, which, if that means he was a member of the Academy, would likely meet WP:NACADEMIC, 3, since the Academy is limited to 350 members. Jahaza (talk) 21:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Mild delete. WP:NACADEMIC doens't provide his a proper criterion. He didn't chair Polish Academy of Sciences. The honorary professor in Soviet-block states is kind of a trivial thing, and it also doesn't meet WP:NACADEMIC as for me. Maybe I explain the rules in a wrong way. Would be glad to hear some feedback. 多少 战场 龙 (talk) 08:19, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The entire "Klich" family seems to have been added to WP by User:Wojtek Klich. This article mainly has non-third party sources that look to be institutional. There are also fewer sources that it appears because of duplicates. I find only a few items in G Scholar and only one with about two dozen cites. He doesn't meet WP:NACADEMIC. Lamona (talk) 03:50, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete or redirect to Bogdan Klich. He may meet pl wiki criteria (which make anyone who got habilitation notable), but our criteria (WP:NPROF) are tighter. There is nothing in the cited sources or article to suggest he meets them. There are further sources cited on AGH wiki (https://historia.agh.edu.pl/wiki/Adam_Klich), but only one looks non-trivial/independent: "Współcześni uczeni polscy : słownik biograficzny. T. 2 : H - Ł. Red. nauk. J. Kapuścik. Warszawa 1999, s. 338." Unfortunately, it's not online so it's hard to verify the amount of coverage in it. Unless someone can access this and show us if WP:SIGCOV is met, I am afraid the subject doesn't meet GNG/NBIO/NPROF. PS. A merge and redirect to  Bogdan Klich might be considered too. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  03:23, 14 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.