Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Lacey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Adam Lacey

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I am the subject of the article and I am wishing to lead a more private life, I do not believe I am a person of public interest. I removed online articles via other sites. I have even spoke to the person who created the page who tried to delete this previously but was blocked, I am now reaching out personally to try and resolve this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamL88 (talk • contribs) 09:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The claim to notability seems to be that he performed with notable people; topics are not notable by association.  The sources don't seem to have significant coverage of him. 331dot (talk) 10:03, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 September 7.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 10:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Theatre,  and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 11:11, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep some sourcing is about him, but just barely. Oaktree b (talk) 15:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:TOOSOON-- perhaps an article could be pieced together on the Forever Tenors in the future, but currently it looks like notability by association as noted above. Gilded Snail (talk) 15:22, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. One reference link is dead & goes to a 404 page, others the Internet Archive. Questionable whether passes the notability requirements of WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:SINGER to qualify for an article at this time. He appears to be leaving the field so additional references are unlikely.  5Q5 &#124;&#9993; 11:33, 9 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.