Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Levin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 09:52, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Adam Levin

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Non-notable musician that is likely an entire WP:AUTO violation (only contributor is, who removed prod with no comment). &mdash; RevRagnarok  Talk Contrib 14:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Appears to have AllMusic entry but no discography. A1octopus 22:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Comment: There hasn't been much discussion because it's a non-notable autobiographical (8 of 12 edits, 3 were mine tagging it prod/afd) entry and I question why we are relisting when even the author/subject hasn't bothered to even comment... &mdash; RevRagnarok  Talk Contrib 11:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * RevRagnarok, good point on lack of participation, and I do suspect this will end in Delete, but I'd like to see some stronger arguments. COI isn't strictly a reason to delete -- it's a red flag for POV, and likewise, lack of discography in AMG is also a red flag but not a robust reason. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-07 12:43Z 
 * Notability is indicated in references on Allmusic, The Gibraltar Encyclopedia of Progressive Rock and the Warr Guitars web site. All independent sources. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alevin (talk • contribs) 11:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC).
 * |LEVIN Allmusic only has the band. Same with Gibraltar. Which doesn't explain away the WP:AUTO and WP:COI violations. Sorry, you may not mean it, but it smells like spam. &mdash; RevRagnarok  Talk Contrib 12:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Given the lack of notability, the lack of WP:BIO credibility and a pretty serious COI. JBEvans 18:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.