Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Lewis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ~  L'Aquatique   [  talk  ] 02:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Adam Lewis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There are 1000's of Adam Lewis's in the world, and this Adam Lewis is very insignificant. He was in a band for 18 months, that hardly constitutes having a wikipedia page. Adamwlewis (talk) 19:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Other Adams Lewises including you are even less significant :-). Anyway; entertainment guys by the virtue of their occupation are more notable than an average joe. The notablity criterion is: what are the chances that people would like to read about this person. Answer: those interested of the band in question, which seems moderately notable. A reasonable solution would be merge/redirect into Breed 77, since there seems really nothing much to write. `'Míkka>t 20:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and delete Well, I actually beg to differ on me being less significant. I own one of the largest online scrapbooking websites in the world, Scrapo.com, and am profiled in 300-400 websites throughout the internet. Which is actually my point, I am quite a bit more well known and I would never consider having my own Wikipedia page. None of the other past members of Breed 77 have their own Wiki's: Lawrence Bautista, Nick Beefly, Charlie Gomez, Dan Wilkinson, Peter Chichone. It would be different if this Adam Lewis had a large profile with lots of information, but it is literally just 3 sentances. I agree with merging and deleting. Adamwlewis (talk) 20:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and delete Merge any info into Breed 77 and either delete or turn into a disambig page, as this individual isn't notable outside the band. P HARMBOY ( TALK ) 23:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Merge or redirect should only occur if "Breed 77" is actually shown to be important/significant itself. That article has many unsupported claims but, no reliable sourcing at present. Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No claim of notability in the article, nor any real suggestion of it in Breed 77. Bongomatic (talk) 21:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Last time I looked, it listed him as a member on that page, with a link to this page (the only band member with a wikilink) P HARMBOY ( TALK ) 22:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable outside of band. Mentioned in band page, no point in merging uncited "information" to damage that article.Yobmod (talk) 13:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Question out of curiosity does anyone know where the redirect that used to be at the page went to? Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment no clue, never saw it. it's always just been this weak page. (talk) 16:13, 10 Octover 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.62.250.60 (talk)


 * Delete Not notable outside, or even really inside, the Breed77 band. Information not referenced and member is not in band anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.53.18.138 (talk) 21:55, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:50, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.