Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Lovelock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:30, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Adam Lovelock

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable boxer. Does not meet WP:NBOX or other criteria. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:49, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:49, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable boxer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:00, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable boxer who's currently ranked #332 in the world by Boxrec. Just fought his 18th fight--against someone with one previous bout.  I found no significant independent coverage of him that couldn't be considered routine sports coverage. Papaursa (talk) 01:11, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 14:38, 7 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- no claim to notability; no meaningful bio content & no RS offered or available. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable boxer....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.