Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Lyons (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 20:42, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Adam Lyons
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is close to G4 territory, but sufficiently different to merit another AFD. The most important issue of notability doesn't seem to have been addressed. This local source has been written since but that still seems to the best source for providing evidence of notability. This other 2015 source doesn't appear reliable. I suggest redirecting and briefly mentioning him in The Zebra. SmartSE (talk) 16:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Note the first two AFDs were about a different Adam Lyons. and  who !voted in the previous AFD. SmartSE (talk) 16:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:18, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:18, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   10:08, 4 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep I see several articles cited in the sources about him. I would suggest cutting out sources not about this article subject. Tangledupinbleu chs (talk) 06:07, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮  JAaron95  Talk   15:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep I was the nominator of the third AFD--actual deletion-- for Adam Lyons (UK dating coach), so all three previous discussions were about a diff. Lyons. This Lyons didn't muster G4 imo (diff. subject/not a recreation) and I believe I declined a speedy for this reasoning. Apart from that, the 30 Under 30 possibly warrants a weak keep for individual recognition. There's a couple profiles here and here that aren't referenced tda.. probably worth adding. My main issue is "The Zebra" subsection and lengthy excess not about Lyons. Worth cutting and I don't mind doing so. :) Overall, enough refs and Inc. recog. for a keep albeit slightly weak. Make sure to differentiate the subj. though. Jppcap (talk) 16:04, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.