Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Marczyński


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep  WingtipvorteX   PTT   ∅  21:30, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Adam Marczyński

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Unsourced, pre 18-Mar-2010 BLP. Article does not establish why subject meets WP:N. WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  23:57, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

*Delete. No sources and not notable, not to mention poorly written.Michael5046 (talk) 09:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Until yesterday this was a biography of a deceased artist, also on the Polish and German Wikipedia. Then a SPA dumped a semi-coherent BLP about a youthful handball player /graffitist over it. I'm going to restore the status quo and if someone really thinks that the sportsman/graffitist merits an article, they can start it in the normal way rather than by fouling an existing article. AllyD (talk) 16:39, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, suggest early close I've reinstated the article on the subject who it covered from 2004 until yesterday, and also added a couple of initial references. As this is no longer about the non-notable individual, I'm contacting the proposer to suggest an early keep close? AllyD (talk) 16:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * As the proposer, and after AllyD's explanation, agree to keep the article and early close this discussion. -- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  21:08, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't believe the criteria are met for me to execute a non-admin closure of the discussion, so I'm looking for an admin to do so. -- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  21:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It does under speedy keep as I withdraw the nomination. Doing that now. -- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  21:20, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Leaving a request for Michael5046 to change his mind, so we may fully qualify for speedy keep. -- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  21:20, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I did not know the article had been changed. Will change my vote to keep. Michael5046 (talk) 21:23, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * With that, the article qualifies for WP:SK, so I will perform a non-admin closure of this discussion. -- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  21:25, 1 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.