Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Mokhtar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Carioca 01:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Adam Mokhtar

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Asserts notability as New Zealand's leading chiropractor but absolutely no citations, references, sources etc. Speedy was declined. Doesn't meet WP:BIO (not even if bent over backwards!) WebHamster 02:21, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete or strong delete. I could find zilch information about this person. No basis for the claim of notability. gidonb 02:31, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Judging by the creator's other edits, this could also be a hoax. gidonb 02:34, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Unreferenced, unverifiable claim to notability, not exactly neutral either. I can't find a darn thing on the guy either. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 03:05, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions.   --  gadfium  04:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless claims are sourced.- gadfium 04:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Very, very weak assertion of notability. (Top 100, top 500, top 1m?) Completely unsourced and unverifiable. --Evb-wiki 14:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. 17 Ghits for the name, no chiropracter.  Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  18:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Hamster, please do bend over backwards. Chances are you're going to hurt yourself. Then you can go see the guy and tell us whether he's actually good... ;)  1 redrun  Talk 09:00, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * delete Doesn't even claim to be the best: "one of New Zealand's top chiropractors." DGG (talk) 17:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.