Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Ray (adraycun)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 20:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Adam Ray (adraycun)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Self-created, promotional article, mostly social media as references, no clear evidence that he meets WP:GNG or WP:ENT Melcous (talk) 00:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. No independent, reliable sources that would indicate notability apart from the BBC interview from a few months ago, but that isn't enough to meet WP:GNG or WP:ENT. Even in that interview, at 8:50-ish, the subject basically admits that this is very new and he isn't famous yet. Patar knight - chat/contributions 13:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G11, blatant advertising. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 21:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete He is a non-notable person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Far from notable (based on article's references and quick online search). Star Islington (talk) 11:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.