Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Robert Sahlberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:31, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Adam Robert Sahlberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject has achieved quite a few medals and decorations, but is this worthy of inclusion in an encyclopaedia? The article was tagged A7 for several hours, which I have declined as I think it needs discussion, not speedy. The tagger thinks this fails WP:SOLDIER, and I think I agree. Peridon (talk) 21:23, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - doesn't meet WP:SOLDIER. His awards are not notable and this article sounds more like a puff piece. Hard to believe it had been on WP for 4yrs without anyone noticing Gbawden (talk) 05:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete while the subject has received significant coverage in secondary reliable sources, the subject has not received significant coverage in non-primary or secondary reliable sources, therefore the subject appears to not be notable as defined by WP:GNG. As a Soldier, the subject does not appear to meet any of the criteria set forth in WP:SOLDIER. Therefore, at this time the subject does not appear to be notable, and it is my recommendation that this article is deleted.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 13:58, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - subject lacks "significant coverage" in reliable sources and is therefore not notable per WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 08:55, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. None of his awards are notable enough to qualify him for an article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:SOLDIER. His awards do not cause him to pass WP:GNG. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:46, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing to support WP:GNG or WP:SOLDIER. --I am One of Many (talk) 09:09, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.