Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Saab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 10:18, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Adam Saab

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Campaign-style bio, relying entirely on WP:PRIMARYSOURCES and trivial coverage, of an unsuccessful electoral candidate with no properly sourced indication that he actually meets WP:POLITICIAN in any significant way. Also presents WP:COI issues, as the bulk of the article's edit history was performed by editors named User:Adamsaab and User:Besh Saab (and I have my suspicions about creator User:Rubbercamel, too.)
 * Delete. Bearcat (talk) 19:52, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete He fails WP:POLITICIAN and no other claim of notability is made. 174.253.245.54 (talk) 02:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 11 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment: failing to meet WP:Politician in itself is not a reason to delete. Here is a source that gives coverage of some (non-trivial) depth for Adam Saab. However, failing more sources than just the local University paper, he probably fails WP:GNG too. DigitalC (talk) 00:16, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't seem to mind much in the way of non-trivial reliable sources. Qrsdogg (talk) 04:10, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.