Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Sietz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Adam Sietz

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Blatant autobio with no evidence of notability. &mdash; RHaworth 00:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Neutral - I am suspicious, especially about that Emmy. If his claims are true then he is quite notable. &lt;( User:Couch on his Head and Smiling (talk) )&gt; 06:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable voice actor with some small parts in other areas. There is a string of claimed masteries on his web site that a person would require 5 lifetimes to achieve to a degree.  There is no reliable sources that indicate notability.  The claim of an Emmy is absolute bollox.  - Pmedema (talk) 14:58, 12 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Blatant auto-puffing. 75.150.76.129 (talk) 17:36, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails the general notability requirement of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. To be be honest, there is no real indication of significance or importance here, or of why there should be an encyclopedic article about Mr Sietz, other than the Emmy Award. However, the Emmy appears not to be a Primetime Emmy, perhaps its a Student or Regional Emmy, but I can't find any reliable, independent sources for this. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:11, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.