Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Tinworth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Adam Tinworth

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No demonstration of notability. Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Promotional article. Edwardx (talk) 12:23, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 14:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 14:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss  fortune 14:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per the nom. I'm not seeing anything in reliable sources to indicate this person is notable. --Izno (talk) 14:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete- per nom.--Rusf10 (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete although Tinworth is not a businessman, but an editor and journalist, maybe at times bordering on being a publisher. There is a lack of significant coverage to show notability though.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise move to WP:DRAFT. BOZ (talk) 04:44, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for trying to find more sources, but none of them constitute WP:SIGCOV. Edwardx (talk) 11:11, 19 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.