Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Tritt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted per A7 by Ohnoitsjamie. '' a s e nine  say what? '' 06:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Adam Tritt

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't appear to meet the notability guidelines for creative professionals. Polly (Parrot) 02:47, 12 May 2008 (UTC) Creative professional is the category in which Mr. Tritt does qualify, refereence the duely noted and listed critical acclaim in the article as it currently exists. Unless you intend to hide behind an interpretation of the definition of the word 'significant.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.10.137.232 (talk)
 * Delete. Promo.  Not notable.  "He is ultimately an awe-inspiring AMAZING writer and teacher that has more to offer than this world is ready for" says the article.  KleenupKrew (talk) 02:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * How about Notability? That's a pretty irrefutable definition there. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * G12 Copyvio of his own website. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:COPYVIO, WP:COI, WP:N. / Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. J I P  | Talk 04:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.