Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Weinstein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:50, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Adam Weinstein

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article has been tagged with notability concerns since late last year and an IP recently raised notability concerns at WP:BLP/N. Seems to be well-known for only one thing - his involvement in controversy around a particular photo. Unless we can substantiate notability for more than one event, we probably shouldn't have an article about this individual. Stalwart 111  00:26, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. This does look like BLP1E, but even if not, I'm not seeing the significant third party coverage for anything else. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clearly doesn't meet our WP:BIO criteria, even BLP1E criteria is severely lacking. Shadowjams (talk) 01:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I wouldn't even say this is a BLP1E, because this was decidedly a non-event. The Trayvon Martin case is obviously notable, this photo incident does, IMHO, not even deserve a footnote in that article. --Randykitty (talk) 07:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and above. Sources are inadequate. I don't even understand why the Capital source is news. Grayfell (talk) 07:20, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Randykitty and Stalwart are correct. Drmies (talk) 19:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet the WP:BIO criteria. One controversy does not notability make. CrookedwithaK (talk) 09:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per BLP1E, if it even rises to that level. Northern Antarctica (talk) Previously known as AutomaticStrikeout 21:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.