Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Wiltzie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was KEEP. -Docg 22:17, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Adam Wiltzie

 * — (View AfD)

WP:V, WP:BIO. Deproded. Delete - crz crztalk 16:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - One of the primary members of The Dead Texan and Stars of the Lid. Very important in the Drone music genre.  --Oakshade 23:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. - A cursory search for the subject provides information on notable acts connected to the subject. Nominator's motives are suspect. --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 00:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Huh? - crz crztalk 02:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; article does not assert notability under WP:MUSIC. The external links given as references are interviews.  The discogs.com entry is a trivial mention, rather than the kind of in-depth coverage necessary to support a proper encyclopedia article. -- Chondrite 22:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Importance seems to have been asserted, but it is certainly not backed up by the citations provided.  Does not meet WP:BIO at all. Mus Musculus 13:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No coverage of article subject by reliable, third-party published sources. -- Satori Son 22:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Larry V (talk &#124; contribs) 23:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Not a household name but notable within genre. Capitalistroadster 03:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. A Google News Archive comes up with 19 references.
 * Weak delete I don't think it would take much to have this person/article pass notability, but it's not there just yet. Akihabara 03:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above, recommend nominator does not use jargon in deletion reasoning. Catchpole 12:01, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.