Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Zelga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Alfred Szklarski. (non-admin closure) Randykitty (talk) 08:23, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Adam Zelga

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable author. Unsourced, which is a requirement for a WP:BLP ES  &#38;L  16:57, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * redirect to Alfred_Szklarski and add a sentence there that Zelga completed the final work posthumously. there are what appear to be a number of hits to Russian language news sources for the name  but without evidence the the hits are for the same Adam Zelga and that it is the Adam Zelga author/priest in our article, and that they provide any significant content about the subject, Adam Zelga  should not be a stand alone article. --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  18:40, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * redirect to Alfred_Szklarski, refer to the fact that Adam Zelga finished his last work. --Nlfestival (talk) 18:57, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Alfred Szklarski (a more-appropriate target); unsourced BLP.  Mini  apolis  01:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect I'm on the fence between deleting and redirecting to Alfred Szklarski. I'm not convinced enough that redirecting to a sentence about Zelga completing a work is enough to warrant a redirect. However redirects are cheap and it won't cause any harm other than there not being a redlink. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.