Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Zomar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 01:59, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Adam Zomar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability in independent sources. Contested PROD.  Acroterion   (talk)   15:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * delete - and actually go ahead and supersize that. i'd like a double delete with cheese please.  appears to be a total WP:AB since article creator has done one thing: create and protect the article Adam Zomar and the creator's screenname is DAYZRAMO2012, which remarkably contains all of the letters of the article subject's last name. and four of them are in reverse alphabetical order: Z+RAMO (Z --> OMAR).  a claim that there's just a coincidence at work doesn't pass the smell-test. also: not notable, no significant RS. article creator "Removed proposed deletion notice because two reliable sources exist. www.adamzomar.com and adamzomar.blogspot.com" which are clearly NOT reliable sources, being self-published.  the other " sources" include zomar's own linkedin account, zomar's twitter page, and zomar's IMDB page.  IMDB blp info is not RS due to well-known self-publishing capability there.Cramyourspam (talk) 16:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Yup. An IMDB bio is not vetted by the IMDB staff. If something in an IMDB is verifiable elsewhere in a reliable source, it is THAT source which should used for citations... not IMDB.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:51, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable person. Someone named ZOMAR333 has just removed the AfD notice from the article, too, so maybe we have a Sock question too. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:09, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable. Links to an IMDB article of someone else, claiming some sort of distant maternal relationship. Totally irrelevant. Iglooflame (talk) 17:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:10, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not to impugn upon the person's work and accomplishments, but after several searches, not finding coverage in reliable sources to qualify topic notability for this article's inclusion in Wikipedia, per WP:GNG. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:42, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.