Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam and Yves


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to La Cage aux Folles (film). (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 02:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Adam and Yves

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The series was announced, but never entered production. Koala15 (talk) 00:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 00:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to La Cage aux Folles (film) (changed from Delete) it was proposed and was dropped, end of story, no lasting impact, something of the "one-event" variety, relegated to be a footnote of History. Refs are short mentions in gossip columns, and two off-line sources with probably the same short trivial mentions. Kraxler (talk) 18:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Amended, per Bearcat, below. Kraxler (talk) 14:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:45, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * As an early incident in the evolving representation of LGBT coverage in media, this is certainly notable enough to merit a line or two somewhere in Wikipedia — but as a show that never actually made it to air, it doesn't really need its own standalone article. Redirect to La Cage aux Folles (film), since that's the film it was based on and there's already a brief mention of it in there. Bearcat (talk) 01:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * You are right, thanks for pointing to the target of the proposed redirect. Kraxler (talk) 14:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect as stated above. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  23:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to La Cage aux Folles (film) per . Certainly doesn't merit a stand-alone article, but it's a sensible redirect (would say selective merge, but there's already a section for it). &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 12:53, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.