Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adams Arms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete but as no assertion of notability, since the criticism is a veiled promotion of the company's innovation. Pegasus &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 01:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Adams Arms

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Attack page. There doesn't seem to be a speedy deletion category for attacks on companies or products, so I listed it for afd. There was a speedy deletion tag on this article back in April, but the original author removed the tag, and there was no followup. Corvus cornix talk  00:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Definitely an attack page, no refs, no notability, etc. More importantly, it was listed for speedy deletion but the main author deleted the tag. Bsimmons666 (talk) 01:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * G10 Unless I'm wrong, an attack page doesn't have to be about a person, it can be about a company too. This is clearly an attack page. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.