Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adaptability quotient


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:42, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Adaptability quotient

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Mix of promotional content, original research, and blatant copyright violations (e.g. ). Very poor sourcing -- lots of links to youtube, medium articles, and corporate pages selling products/services, or just totally unrelated material (e.g. the studies used do not mention AQ at all). Also the original creator was banned for only being here to write promotional content. Citing (talk) 15:45, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT. The poor sourcing noted by the nominator also includes Forbes "contributor" nonsense. 75% on Earwig's Copyvio Detector. Nuke it from orbit; it's the only way to be sure. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 19:41, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and XOR&#39;easter. Footlessmouse (talk) 13:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. To me, this looks like a POV fork of Psychological resilience. I would not oppose a merger. 17:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.