Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adaptive Predictive Expert Control


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Canley (talk) 11:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Adaptive Predictive Expert Control

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This seems to be a big ad. One main page and some patents do not assert notability. This one is iffy in my mind, so I brought it to AfD. Prod was removed by article's creator. See the talk page for more details given by other editors. My vote, since there is no notability assertations, is a Delete Undeath (talk) 05:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Strong delete This seems to be just promoting someone's rather questionable patent on an pre-existing scientific/engineering field -Model reference control. This field is well established in control theory, with books on the subject - however I am unaware of any common text referencing the associated company or patents. —Preceding unsigned comment added by User A1 (talk • contribs) 11:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Furthermore, parts of the article are false; e.g. "Adaptive Predictive Control was introduced in a patent application in 1976"This paper which was published in 1968, covers model reference and adaptive control - which is adaptive predictive control. A more thorough search might turn up even earlier references. User A1 (talk) 11:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - I've not time to read through all the material it links to, but someone ought to and then report back here!-- TreasuryTag talk contribs  19:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this spam Guy (Help!) 13:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete (I originally PROD-ed the article). As I've said on the talk page, there's no assertion of notability, nor does a web search reveal such notability (at least not in an obvious way).  Oli Filth(talk) 20:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.