Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adath Israel Congregation (Toronto) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. —C.Fred (talk), as nominator, 20:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Adath Israel Congregation (Toronto)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Roughly a decade ago, this article was nominated for deletion. It survived then. However, what I see today is a page about a local place of worship with no indication of notability outside the local area that is devoid of independent reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 04:41, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per notability (established by WP:RS) relating to certain policies found during the previous AFD. That content was removed by someone adffiliated with the synagogue itself, who instead added lots of generic/promotional-tone and copyvio. I've removed the copyvio and revived the previous content that was removed for no obvious reason. Even as of 2011, the policies and their anomalous nature were still a topic for independent reporting ( and others). DMacks (talk) 05:29, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per DMacks. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 14:57, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:27, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:27, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:27, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep The size, scope and history of the congregation are clear evidence of notability. The article will benefit from expansion with the ample available additional sources. Alansohn (talk) 18:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Serves me right for not digging deeper into the article history. Nomination withdrawn. —C.Fred (talk) 20:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.