Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adblade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Adblade

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Rely only on non-credible media sources. Article is written only for company promotional and advertising purposes. No significant coverage by independent media. Nothing significant or notable about the company to be here. does not meet notability criteria. Light21 15:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Light2021 (talk) 14:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - might be notable, but it's not evidenced from the references, which have minor RSes at absolute best (amongst all the press releases and directories) - David Gerard (talk) 16:51, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 17:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 17:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: After research, the only substantial coverage I can find is in unreliable sources (mostly press releases). There is some coverage in RS, but it is WP:TRIVIAL. Safehaven86 (talk) 18:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.