Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addicted (Ace Young song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep. Although a very common misconception, the subject-specific supplemental notability guidelines are an adjunct to WP:N, and do not trump or contradict WP:N. These supplemental guidelines were established by consensus to keep articles that may not meet the vague criteria of WP:N. They allow obviously-notable subject articles to be kept even if there was little or no coverage in independent sources. But by no means do they override the notability that is otherwise established by WP:N; in this case the respondents demonstrated sufficient coverage in independent sources, WP:MUSIC notwithstanding.  Jerry  talk ¤ count/logs 23:00, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Addicted (Ace Young song)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Song didn't chart, seems to fail WP:MUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   — Cliff smith  talk  03:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I've added six references, including a review of the single in Billboard. I would say it's enough to pass WP:N notability. Keep. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 18:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: Basic notability shown with references. -MrFizyx (talk) 19:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.