Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addition Elle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. -- Cirt (talk) 05:04, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Addition Elle

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete or redirect to Reitmans. As it is currently written it is too much like an advertisement (although that is not a reason for deletion). It does not meet WP:CORP. The bar for notability must be set quite high to prevent commercial organisations getting unwarranted articles. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:42, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Reitmans. If this article is not allowed to be kept on Wikipedia, then it should be a redirect to the parent company (as the parent company is apparently more notable than a subsidiary). GVnayR (talk) 03:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Now that GVnayR added sources it meets the notability bar in my opinion (and I think they're reliable enough to give the article a chance to grow). It does have 139 locations so it's not like reading an article about a small local store or a minor clothing chain.  Royal broil  12:37, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I have officially changed my vote to keep thanks to Royalbroil's explanation. GVnayR (talk) 14:04, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:41, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.