Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adeaca One


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Adeaca One

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable product. Self-published information, product listings and common product announcements do not establish notability. The article lacks references with independent in-depth coverage about the topic. Aside from some reseller descriptions a Google search did not reveal any other usable sources. GermanJoe (talk) 22:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Delete. Low quality references and certainly no independent in-depth coverage Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete along with Advanced Projects. Both produced by single-purpose account User:RobertAnderson1971. W Nowicki (talk) 21:37, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Same rationale as I provided in Articles for deletion/Advanced Projects. There simply is no significant coverage to establish notability. Even combining the two product pages into a company page is not going to work as there simply is no coverage that can be used. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:48, 15 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.