Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adebukola Foluke Osunyikanmi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The SandDoctor Talk 05:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Adebukola Foluke Osunyikanmi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable professor who doesn’t satisfy any criterion from WP:PROF neither do they possess in-depth significant coverage in reliable independent of them thus this is a GNG fail as well Celestina007 (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment —I made some improvement on the article and if you want to do trimming of your own, please feel free to do so as I am open to learning new thing on the platform. Meanwhile this article is backed up by several reliable sources, including articles from Vanguardngr, The Guardian, The Nation Newspaper and other notable sources. If you don't like certain parts of the article, then please feel free to remove them, if we get rid of every articule on the platform, how can we that is just getting use to the platform policy improve on our write up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isaacbabatundeo (talk • contribs) 10:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment — The Comment above was made be the creator of the article @, who has now been blocked for using Wikipedia for promotional purposes. Celestina007 (talk) 17:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep tentatively. It's still under construction, and assuming we can verify the facts with good sources, she'd pass WP:PROF. Bearian (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see anything notable in her career, delete. Oaktree b (talk) 02:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - couldn't find anything to meet WP criteria for a BLP page. Kolma8 (talk) 21:32, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete My search in Google scholar found 14 citations for her most highly cited work and an h-index of 3, so it doesn't seem like her papers are significant. I also don't see the significant independent references to show that WP:GNG is met. Papaursa (talk) 00:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.