Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adel Nassief


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  17:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Adel Nassief

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sending to AfD after a WP:DEPROD by Jfire.

Regarding the sources on the talk page posted by the WP:DEPRODer (translated from Arabic to English), I am not sure if any of those sources are reliable or significant enough to satisfy WP:NBIO. So, I still believe that this person may not meet NBIO. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists,  and Egypt. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of COVID-19-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:40, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per the following Arabic-language coverage:
 * The fact that in spite of WP:SYSTEMICBIAS of news sources we have this much coverage indicates that the subject is notable. Jfire (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The fact that in spite of WP:SYSTEMICBIAS of news sources we have this much coverage indicates that the subject is notable. Jfire (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The fact that in spite of WP:SYSTEMICBIAS of news sources we have this much coverage indicates that the subject is notable. Jfire (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The fact that in spite of WP:SYSTEMICBIAS of news sources we have this much coverage indicates that the subject is notable. Jfire (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The fact that in spite of WP:SYSTEMICBIAS of news sources we have this much coverage indicates that the subject is notable. Jfire (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The fact that in spite of WP:SYSTEMICBIAS of news sources we have this much coverage indicates that the subject is notable. Jfire (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The fact that in spite of WP:SYSTEMICBIAS of news sources we have this much coverage indicates that the subject is notable. Jfire (talk) 03:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep per adequate sourcing, with thanks to Jfire for translations and explanations. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep references included and notability meets measure requirments. --Ghaly (talk) 15:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep as passes WP:GNG with significant coverage in multiple reliable sources as mentioned above, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.