Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adelaide's cape


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. treating as prod Spartaz Humbug! 06:07, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Adelaide's cape

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Notability. Already deleted once, a while back, so things might have changed. Chris (talk) 03:13, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

The following was posted on my talk page, and I moved it here: Hello there... I think that Adelaide's Cape has enough notable sources/achievements to be included on Wikipedia now (BBC, The Independent, mainstream festival appearances confirmed etc). He has surely achieved as much as The Kabeedies, who have a page here? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Kabeedies Would be interested to hear your thoughts. Hope I'm discussing this in the right place? Lauren —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jigsawlauren (talk • contribs) 19:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

The thing is that none of the independent references or sources you have given are actually about the band; they're all about the event. Let's see what other people think... Chris (talk) 07:51, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

The BBC article is exclusively about Adelaide's Cape, and links to statements about the festivals he's playing surely provide relevant references? I've added in a link to the Wychwood website where Adelaide's Cape is listed now too http://www.wychwoodfestival.com/line-up/bbc-introducing/. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jigsawlauren (talk • contribs) 08:55, 17 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.