Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adeline Lim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 01:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Adeline Lim

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

WP:NN actor. Runner up in a talent competition. Filmography consists only of talent show and supporting roles. PROD removed by anon with no explanation. Essentially unreferenced. Pburka (talk) 03:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 7 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. She is not notable in Singapore yet as she was only given a few small or supporting roles in MediaCorp drama series. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.1.170 (talk) 05:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:14, 14 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Only one source is used and i don't think its reliable. Also, subject doesn't really seem to be notable. Would it be possible to speedy this? Bonkers The Clown (talk) 14:50, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Although she is the 2nd runner-up of the competition, she is currently not as notable as her fellow contestants such as Romeo Tan and Sora Ma who were given prominent roles in Singapore TV drama series. She is only appearing in various dramas with supporting roles. Notability is a question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.1.150 (talk) 11:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note that since this discussion started the article's author has now completely removed the references section. Pburka (talk) 21:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like copyvio, and not surprisingly promo into the bargain. "Given time and exposure, this effervescent lass will blossom into the one to look out for on the hill" says a lot to me. Peridon (talk) 19:59, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.